In Sequential Workflows the trace settings looks like this:
If there are just three options, the field Trace Level seems unnecessary and this can be set under the Trace property, no?
In Sequential Workflows the trace settings looks like this:
If there are just three options, the field Trace Level seems unnecessary and this can be set under the Trace property, no?
It cannot be merged. The Trace property is calculated and indicates whether the current step will or will not be traced. While the Tracel Level property sets the level for the current nodes and all the sub-nodes that have InheritFromParent set.
Exemple of Trace property results (last column) based on the values of this node and parent node’s Trace Level:
| Current Node’s Trace Level | Parent Node’s Trace Level | Trace |
|---|---|---|
Yes |
Any value | Yes |
No |
Any value | No |
InheritFromParent |
Yes |
Yes |
InheritFromParent |
No |
No |
InheritFromParent |
InheritFromParent |
Depends on higher level nodes |
InheritFromParent |
All the parent nodes are set to InheritFromParent |
No |
Understood, thanks. In that case what about to rename those two properties in order to make it more obvious and comprehensible?
For example – including order change:
Trace Level > Node Trace
Trace > Inherited Result Trace